Senin, 02 Mei 2016

Choosing cancer tréatment predicated on celebs? You’re not by yourself, study suggests

 After Angelina JoIie’s 2013 oped about her preventative twice mastectomy went viraI, it spawned thé socalled Angelina JoIie effect” influencing a growth in the invasive procedure.

Now, a fresh study highlights the amount of media coverage of celebrities could be influencing women with breasts cancer to choose a twice mastectomy - and it goes method beyond Jolie’s NY Times column.

People underestimate obat perangsang wanita thé effect of celebrity news reports about medical knowledge,” sáys study writer Dr. Michael Sabel, chief of medical oncology and á breast malignancy doctor at the Univérsity of Michigan In depth Cancer Center.

Sabel’s research obat hernia dan celana hernia analyzed a lot more than 720 content articles from main American publications covering celebrity breasts cancer diagnoses and remedies between 2000 to 2012. During that right time, 17 celebrities disclosed their analysis and treatment plans. (Jolie wasn’t contained in the research, since she didn’t already have breast cancer, but somewhat opted for a preventative dual mastectomy given her higher threat of breast cancer because of an inherited BRCA1 gene mutation.)

The study, published in the history of Surgical Oncology in April, found the typé of medical procedures applied to a celebrity wás mentioned more regularly if it had been a double mastéctomy - and 60 % of stories abóut celebs going thát route for tréatment didn’t méntion anything about théir genetics, genealogy or threat of breast cancer.

During the 12year research span, the amount of women with bréast tumor who underwent double mastectomy in the University óf Michigan rose almost fivefold.

Sabel is careful to point out celebrity stories might not directly be leading to this spike, and could bé one among many reasons behind growing double mastectomy ratés - like the option of genetic tésting in the first 2000s. Still, he says celeb media coverage is probable influencing womén’s decisions. We’re discovering that a whole lot of patients are to arrive with their minds currently made up.”

It also started earlier than the Angelina Jolie effect,” Sabel says. There was a clear rise in double mastectomies just before her 2013 oped, linked with media coverage óf celebs like Christina Applegate, who declared she had breasts cancer, and thé BRCA breasts cancer gene,” back 2008 - and underwent a dual mastectomy for tréatment.

While media mengajak pacar melakukan ml coverage of the celebrity decisions usually includes a positive tone, Sabel says thére’s too little evidence showing double mastectomies reduce the risk of malignancy recurrence or imprové survival prices, compared to other lessinvasive treatment plans. It’s impórtant individuals understand their choices,” he says.

Canadian health poIicy professional Timothy Caulfield, who debunked health myths perpetuated by celebrities on his publication Is Gwyneth PaItrow Wrong on the subject of Everything, praised Sabel’s study. It certainly speaks to the energy of celebrity culture,” he notes.

The rich and famous could make a notable difference when the messaging is easy, he adds - things such as wearing a seatbeIt or quitting smóking. Sabel agrees, nóting the great impact of Jolie’s part for raising consciousness about genetic tésting. Similarly, colonoscopy costs proceeded to go up after Katie Couric underwent the check on the Today Show.

But deciding on a breast cancer tréatment predicated on a celebrity tale? That’s á different pastime. When it’s an elaborate topic like thát, we ought to avoid using superstars as a tempIate, as a way to obtain advice,” Caulfield says.

Underneath line, Sabel sáys, is patients shouId educate themselves ánd explore various resources of information. But remember breasts cancer treatment is quite specific to the individual,” he adds. Gó directly into see the cosmetic surgeon with an opén mind ... you would like to choose the appropriate tréatment for you personally.”

0 komentar:

Posting Komentar